INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.

For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

We are not accepting any new registrations.

Free speech and false healthcare advice

Enter here to explore ethical issues and discuss the meaning and source of morality.
Message
Author
User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Free speech and false healthcare advice

#21 Post by Alan H » October 8th, 2012, 1:50 am

Latest post of the previous page:

Out now!
What Plumbers Don't Tell You.gif
What Plumbers Don't Tell You.gif (96.93 KiB) Viewed 5628 times
Available from all Alternative Supermarkets.
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Tetenterre
Posts: 3244
Joined: March 13th, 2011, 11:36 am

Re: Free speech and false healthcare advice

#22 Post by Tetenterre » October 12th, 2012, 6:24 pm

The latest from the stable:

Image
Steve

Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Free speech and false healthcare advice

#23 Post by Alan H » December 12th, 2012, 12:42 am

The Nightingale Collaboration: WDDTY #2 - The Second Wave
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: Free speech and false healthcare advice

#24 Post by Dave B » December 12th, 2012, 9:46 am

Well done again, Alan!
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Free speech and false healthcare advice

#25 Post by Alan H » December 19th, 2012, 12:44 am

The Nightingale Collaboration: WDDTY #3 - Strike Three
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Tetenterre
Posts: 3244
Joined: March 13th, 2011, 11:36 am

Re: Free speech and false healthcare advice

#26 Post by Tetenterre » December 19th, 2012, 12:55 am

Yet again, well done!

On the batphone, so expect typos...
Steve

Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.

Fia
Posts: 5480
Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm

Re: Free speech and false healthcare advice

#27 Post by Fia » December 19th, 2012, 7:41 pm

+1

Goodness me, do you NC folk never sleep? :notworthy:

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: Free speech and false healthcare advice

#28 Post by Alan H » December 19th, 2012, 7:50 pm

Fia wrote:+1

Goodness me, do you NC folk never sleep? :notworthy:
Nope! Lots more to come in the New Year...
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

Post Reply