INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
Surveilance capitalism
-
- Posts: 3590
- Joined: July 14th, 2007, 8:38 am
Re: Surveilance capitalism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIXhnWUmMvw
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiraman_Katibin
In Islam, it is claimed that every human has one angel on the right shoulder who records the human's good deeds and another angel on the left shoulder who records the human's bad deeds.
Isn't the social credit system of China doing the same thing where the government has taken on the role of God and the surveillance systems taken on the role of the angels?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Credit_System
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kiraman_Katibin
In Islam, it is claimed that every human has one angel on the right shoulder who records the human's good deeds and another angel on the left shoulder who records the human's bad deeds.
Isn't the social credit system of China doing the same thing where the government has taken on the role of God and the surveillance systems taken on the role of the angels?
Re: Surveilance capitalism
I think what's happening in China is very worrying and I suspect many other countries will be keeping a close eye on developments there, while they try to work out what might work in their country and what they could get away with...
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?