INFORMATION

This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.

For further information, see our Privacy Policy.

Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.

We are not accepting any new registrations.

But is it art?

Enter here to talk about books, art, literature, film, TV and anything else to do with popular culture.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: But is it art?

#101 Post by Dave B » August 17th, 2012, 4:04 pm

Latest post of the previous page:

I should have added that the artwork is in the portfolios.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Tetenterre
Posts: 3244
Joined: March 13th, 2011, 11:36 am

Re: But is it art?

#102 Post by Tetenterre » August 23rd, 2012, 3:48 pm

Steve

Quantum Theory: The branch of science with which people who know absolutely sod all about quantum theory can explain anything.

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: But is it art?

#103 Post by Dave B » August 23rd, 2012, 3:50 pm

Clever, I like it!
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Ken H
Posts: 4256
Joined: February 22nd, 2009, 12:09 am

Re: But is it art?

#104 Post by Ken H » September 18th, 2012, 3:40 pm

The Last Supper
Attachments
Last_supper_with_scientists.jpg
Last_supper_with_scientists.jpg (197.3 KiB) Viewed 15057 times
This is one of the great social functions of science - to free people of superstition. - Steven Weinberg

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: But is it art?

#105 Post by Dave B » September 18th, 2012, 3:50 pm

Brilliant! I think I got most of them, but who was third from left? (He looks a bit like my cardiac consultant!)
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Ken H
Posts: 4256
Joined: February 22nd, 2009, 12:09 am

Re: But is it art?

#106 Post by Ken H » September 18th, 2012, 4:05 pm

Could it be Robert Oppenheimer?
This is one of the great social functions of science - to free people of superstition. - Steven Weinberg

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: But is it art?

#107 Post by Dave B » September 18th, 2012, 4:19 pm

Yup, reckon so! Never seen him in profile that I can remember.
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: But is it art?

#108 Post by Alan H » November 2nd, 2012, 6:15 pm

Be amazed...

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

Fia
Posts: 5480
Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm

Re: But is it art?

#109 Post by Fia » November 2nd, 2012, 9:17 pm

Wow! As someone who suffers from vertigo I'm even more amazed :)

edited to add that this comment on the vis is priceless:





it's FAKE

you can see the ropes
:hilarity:

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: But is it art?

#110 Post by Alan H » November 2nd, 2012, 9:37 pm

:pointlaugh: Missed that!
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Lifelinking
Posts: 3248
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 11:56 am

Re: But is it art?

#111 Post by Lifelinking » November 18th, 2012, 8:46 pm

very cool
"Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice."
William McIlvanney

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: But is it art?

#112 Post by Alan H » December 9th, 2012, 2:42 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: But is it art?

#113 Post by Alan H » December 26th, 2012, 4:59 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: But is it art?

#114 Post by Alan H » December 26th, 2012, 5:02 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

Fia
Posts: 5480
Joined: July 6th, 2007, 8:29 pm

Re: But is it art?

#115 Post by Fia » December 26th, 2012, 9:29 pm

Wow! Knew boiled bovine bones had a use somewhere :)

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: But is it art?

#116 Post by Alan H » January 7th, 2013, 11:29 am

Marvelous!

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: But is it art?

#117 Post by Alan H » January 7th, 2013, 1:13 pm

Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: But is it art?

#118 Post by Dave B » January 7th, 2013, 3:20 pm

... and lights them very carefully.

Clever, eh, what?

I would cheat and use a blunt styli, with the paper on a medium hard rubber sheet, to draw the features!
"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Lifelinking
Posts: 3248
Joined: July 4th, 2007, 11:56 am

Re: But is it art?

#119 Post by Lifelinking » January 10th, 2013, 3:50 pm

.. and lights them very carefully.
:hilarity:
"Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice."
William McIlvanney

User avatar
Dave B
Posts: 17809
Joined: May 17th, 2010, 9:15 pm

Re: But is it art?

#120 Post by Dave B » February 22nd, 2013, 10:00 pm

"Look forward; yesterday was a lesson, if you did not learn from it you wasted it."
Me, 2015

User avatar
Alan H
Posts: 24067
Joined: July 3rd, 2007, 10:26 pm

Re: But is it art?

#121 Post by Alan H » March 9th, 2013, 12:37 am

Read the introduction, then watch the video.

Marina Abramovic and Ulay
Alan Henness

There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:

1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?

Post Reply