INFORMATION
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are essential to make our site work and others help us to improve by giving us some insight into how the site is being used.
For further information, see our Privacy Policy.
Continuing to use this website is acceptance of these cookies.
We are not accepting any new registrations.
Itchy
- John Jones
- Official Pet Troll
- Posts: 29
- Joined: October 18th, 2010, 7:21 pm
Itchy
Should we scratch our ass when we are At One with Ourselves?
Should we, when we are expounding the Humanist position, fart?
Should we, when practicing altruism, buy a round of beer for all the lads?
If you know the answer to these, or similar questions, I defy you. I defy you here and now, and may you not scratch my ass unless my will so entreats.
Should we, when we are expounding the Humanist position, fart?
Should we, when practicing altruism, buy a round of beer for all the lads?
If you know the answer to these, or similar questions, I defy you. I defy you here and now, and may you not scratch my ass unless my will so entreats.
Re: Itchy
so are your will and your ass simpatico?John Jones wrote:Should we scratch our ass when we are At One with Ourselves?
Should we, when we are expounding the Humanist position, fart?
Should we, when practicing altruism, buy a round of beer for all the lads?
If you know the answer to these, or similar questions, I defy you. I defy you here and now, and may you not scratch my ass unless my will so entreats.
- Lifelinking
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: July 4th, 2007, 11:56 am
Re: Itchy
It seems like an opportunity lost not to make a nice word association game out of it though. As JJ started off with itchy I say:
Scratchy
Scratchy
"Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice."
William McIlvanney
William McIlvanney
- Lifelinking
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: July 4th, 2007, 11:56 am
Re: Itchy
nosey!
"Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice."
William McIlvanney
William McIlvanney
- Lifelinking
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: July 4th, 2007, 11:56 am
Re: Itchy
Rosey
"Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice."
William McIlvanney
William McIlvanney
- Lifelinking
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: July 4th, 2007, 11:56 am
Re: Itchy
batsman
"Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice."
William McIlvanney
William McIlvanney
Re: Itchy
bowler
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
- Lifelinking
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: July 4th, 2007, 11:56 am
Re: Itchy
hats
"Who thinks the law has anything to do with justice? It's what we have because we can't have justice."
William McIlvanney
William McIlvanney
Re: Itchy
We could make this a marathon thread, Dave.
Alan Henness
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?
There are three fundamental questions for anyone advocating Brexit:
1. What, precisely, are the significant and tangible benefits of leaving the EU?
2. What damage to the UK and its citizens is an acceptable price to pay for those benefits?
3. Which ruling of the ECJ is most persuasive of the need to leave its jurisdiction?